Production costs were soaring and competition, especially from television, negatively impacted the chances for investors to recoup the increasing costs to mount a Broadway musical.
A romantic comedy starring Peter Sellers and Sophia Loren sounds like a surefire treat, but the two have little chemistry as actors and even less as the two characters they portray. Loren is a chic heiress, and Sellers is an altruistic Indian doctor.
She becomes determined to win his love for reasons which must have been in the script's first draft, because they're certainly missing from the final product.
The eventual plot gimmick is that the two give each other a test to prove their worthiness in marriage: However, the story takes far too long to arrive at this point, and once it does, the challenges are dispensed with far too easily.
Really, the best reason to see this film is to ogle Loren's astonishing beauty -- and, yes, she has a couple of tame lingerie scenes. No doubt, "The Millionairess" is an obscenity compared to George Bernard Shaw play on which it is loosely based.
This irritating, star-ridden train-wreck of a film might have the visual glamour of Oliver! It takes a potentially edgy play by the great George Bernard Show, removes all the edges, misses every irony and thus creates a really unlikable piece of Dramatic irony in pygmalion.
His plays poke fun at the idle rich and in doing so make deeper political points about the inherent flaws in British society. There is virtually none of this subtext, or subtlety, in The Millionairess. She is frosty and unlovable from beginning to end, a spoilt brat with an irritating pout and smarmy gaze which does not so much seduce as repel.
Rather than being a socialist story of redemption through honest work and human compassion, this is a film which is totally in love with the ideas of capitalism, inequality, self-worth and privilege.
This is a film which is ultimately more interested in what the women are wearing than in the moral dilemmas which face the characters. This becomes even more surprising, and insulting, when we find that the film is helmed by Anthony Asquith, who also directed Pygmalion, The Winslow Boy and The Importance of Being Earnest.
How did a man of such clear talent drop the ball so far?! The answer is not immediately clear, although looking at his subsequent output he was certainly past his prime as a filmmaker.
It may be due to the fact that Shaw mediated the other adaptations of his work, and that without that stern and guiding hand Asquith simply retreated into flashy convention. It is very difficult to put Peter Sellers on screen and make him unfunny, but Asquith manages it just fine.
Sellers seems lost in the role of the Indian doctor, and he is given very little to work with beyond the odd half-decent scene for instance, him handing out money in the street, a la The Magic Christian.
The film is further spoiled by very lazy editing which does nothing to help the narrative and on at least two occasions is just plain annoying.
Elsewhere there are too many dissolves from one scene to the next. Not only does this make the film languid, but it confirms that the filmmakers are more interested in the beauty and fashions than the plot.
We do get occasional moments in which things fleetingly improve. His voice does become annoying by the end, and his scenes are incoherently staged, but he has a great deal more presence than either of the major stars. There is also a pleasant cameo by Alfie Bass, who plays the kipper salesman.
He is given very little to do either by the script or the director, but if nothing else he manages to distract our attention from the annoying Loren for a little longer. In sum, though, The Millionairess is a stupid and shallow film, which is unfunny, unmemorable, badly constructed and completely full of itself.
It is testament to all that was wrong with post-war cinema, in its construction, narrative, contrived dramatic devices and bad casting. The ending is insulting and makes no sense, there is no romantic tension between the characters, the editing is ludicrous and neither Sellers nor Loren are in the least bit charming.
For all the problems of My Fair Lady, or Oliver! The Millionairess has nothing of the sort, being instead one of the most repulsive and sickening films of the earlys.Dramatic Irony shows contrast in what the author means and what the reader knows is true.
A dramatic irony is seen when Eliza is at the party and everyone thinks she is a queen. This is dramatic irony because in reality she is the exact opposite of a queen. DRAMATIC IRONY occurs when the audience knows something the characters do not.
Example of dramatic irony in Pygmalion: In Act III, the reader knows that Eliza is a flower girl who is being given elocution lessons; however, the Eynsford Hills believe she is a "respectable" member of society.
Shaw weaves irony seamlessly into pygmalion. A primary source of the books ironic content stems from Henry Higgins. Notably there is irony in his interactions with the other characters in the book.
Sep 11, · On the previous list of errors I included Irony as a bonus – it deserves its own place and a fully description so here it is. There are four types of irony (none of which resemble remotely anything in Alanis Morissette’s song.
Dramatic Irony In Pygmalion. Effective Dramatic Irony In Oedipus The King, Sophocles creates rising action by asking dramatic questions throughout the play. These questions generate suspense in the audience when they become dramatic irony and amplify the climax.
During the falling action, Oedipus is engulfed in misery when he experiences a . There are three kinds of irony, generally referred to as verbal, situational, and dramatic.
Verbal irony is defined as "ironic statements" with typically "a .